Web Quality Index
Web Quality Index · Method v1.2.0

/ / vendor / shufflehound

WordPress Developers - Shufflehound

shufflehound.com·Fcohort grade·49.0 mean·2/2 sites scored·0/2 meet Web Standards·range 4553·median 49·built 2 sites

Categories

CategoryGradeScoreMeasurements
Brand PresenceF 2019
Modern WebF 304
Security & InfrastructureF 4326
Privacy & ComplianceF 499
Email & CommunicationsF 5221
PerformanceF 5312
AI ReadinessD 606
AccessibilityD 629
SEO & DiscoverabilityD 6512
SecurityC 7016
Trust & ReputationA 904
Tech FingerprintA 1002

Common failure pattern

Factors that score below 50 on at least 75% of this vendor's attributed sites. Δ vs index = how much worse the cohort fails compared to the all-WQI baseline. Sorted by Δ desc.

FactorCategoryCohort %Index %Δ vs index
Heading hierarchy validityAccessibility100.0%45.1%+54.9%
HTTP/3 supportModern Web100.0%51.4%+48.6%
Skip-to-content linkAccessibility100.0%53.9%+46.1%
Lead magnet / signup incentive detected (free download, ebook, etc.)Email & Communications100.0%74.6%+25.4%
Email Service Provider (ESP) detectedEmail & Communications100.0%75.7%+24.3%
Transactional email provider detected (from SPF includes)Email & Communications100.0%86.7%+13.3%
DNSSEC validationSecurity & Infrastructure100.0%94.4%+5.6%
CAA recordsSecurity & Infrastructure100.0%95.5%+4.5%
HSTS preload list inclusionSecurity & Infrastructure100.0%95.8%+4.2%
MTA-STS & TLS-RPTSecurity & Infrastructure100.0%98.5%+1.5%

Attributed sites · 2

Detection: regex for every site · no theme credits

SiteScoreFactorsLast scored
piensachile.com53612026-05-12
pirev.com.mx45612026-05-12

Cohort = every site whose footer credits this vendor. Composite scores come from the same registry pass that powers per-site dossiers; sites shown without a score haven't been audited yet. Open the knowledge base (KB in the header) for how each factor is measured.