/ / vendor / 1stcityguide
Become Licensee City Guide
1stcityguide.com·Fcohort grade·58.0 mean·1/1 sites scored·0/1 meet Web Standards·range 58–58·median 58·built 1 site
Categories
| Category | Grade | Score | Measurements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand Presence | F | 28 | 5 |
| Email & Communications | F | 33 | 9 |
| Security & Infrastructure | F | 39 | 12 |
| Privacy & Compliance | F | 48 | 5 |
| Security | C | 70 | 8 |
| Modern Web | C | 77 | 3 |
| AI Readiness | C | 77 | 3 |
| Performance | C | 78 | 6 |
| Accessibility | A | 94 | 5 |
| SEO & Discoverability | A | 97 | 7 |
| Tech Fingerprint | A | 100 | 1 |
| Trust & Reputation | A | 100 | 1 |
Common failure pattern
Factors that score below 50 on at least 75% of this vendor's attributed sites. Δ vs index = how much worse the cohort fails compared to the all-WQI baseline. Sorted by Δ desc.
| Factor | Category | Cohort % | Index % | Δ vs index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email forwarding service detected (improvmx, forwardemail, etc.) | Email & Communications | 100.0% | 11.1% | +88.9% |
| IPv6 support | Modern Web | 100.0% | 53.5% | +46.5% |
| Cookie banner presence + CMP detection | Privacy & Compliance | 100.0% | 66.5% | +33.5% |
| Lead magnet / signup incentive detected (free download, ebook, etc.) | Email & Communications | 100.0% | 74.6% | +25.4% |
| Email Service Provider (ESP) detected | Email & Communications | 100.0% | 75.7% | +24.3% |
| Transactional email provider detected (from SPF includes) | Email & Communications | 100.0% | 86.7% | +13.3% |
| Image optimization (WebP/AVIF) | Performance | 100.0% | 89.5% | +10.5% |
| DNSSEC validation | Security & Infrastructure | 100.0% | 94.4% | +5.6% |
| CAA records | Security & Infrastructure | 100.0% | 95.5% | +4.5% |
| HSTS preload list inclusion | Security & Infrastructure | 100.0% | 95.8% | +4.2% |
Attributed sites · 1
Detection: dom-single for every site · no theme credits
| Site | Score | Factors | Last scored |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1stboiseguide.com | 58 | 56 | 2026-05-17 |
Cohort = every site whose footer credits this vendor. Composite scores come from the same registry pass that powers per-site dossiers; sites shown without a score haven't been audited yet. Open the knowledge base (KB in the header) for how each factor is measured.