Web Quality Index
Scan complete · Scanned May 11, 2026 · 36 of 36 standards scored (64 didn’t apply)

Home/Reports/nnfestival.org.uk

nnfestival.org.uk

20-year-old saaS / Product site, served through CloudFront, with email running through custom-or-self-hosted.

Site typeSaaS / Product
Built onwordpress
Hosted byAWS CloudFront (GLOBAL)
Registered withFasthosts Internet Ltd
Domain age≈ 20 years
Sends email throughcustom-or-self-hosted
Managed hostAWS CloudFront (GLOBAL)
CDN / WAFCloudFront / Imperva
DMARC policynone
Web Quality Score
63/100
Solid
Meets the baseline standards we measure against — but with real room to improve.
Check breakdown
51 scored
A further 19 standards didn’t apply to this site — most are accessibility and privacy tests that need page contents to evaluate.
Can people find this site?
54
Needs work
15 standards behind this question
Pass2Fail3
Fail

Whether your behind-the-scenes labels are valid

We didn't find any structured-data tags on your homepage.

WEBQ-39
Fail

A trail showing where visitors are on your site

No breadcrumb schema is published. Search engines can't show breadcrumb trails under your listings, and visitors lose the trail to important pages.

WEBQ-40
Fail

How well your site feeds AI the right facts

We couldn't find any organization details in your page's structured data.

WEBQ-45
Pass

How your site appears when shared or in search results

Your homepage has the title, description, OG, Twitter, and canonical tags.

WEBQ-11
Pass

How easy it is to reach your deepest pages

Important pages are reachable in just a click or two from your homepage.

WEBQ-43

10 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it fast?
59
Solid
14 standards behind this question
Pass3Fail4
Fail

Your site uses the newest connection style

Your server still serves over the older HTTP/2 protocol — not the newer, faster HTTP/3.

WEBQ-30
Fail

Your photos are saved in modern formats

Your images are served as JPEG or PNG when modern formats (WebP, AVIF) would cut their size by 30–60% with no visible loss.

WEBQ-32
Fail

Your site can be saved to a phone's home screen

No Web App Manifest is published. Visitors can't install your site as a home-screen app.

WEBQ-67
Fail

How fast your site loads on a phone

Your homepage is slow on mobile. The data Google uses to rank pages says real visitors wait too long for it to feel ready.

WEBQ-08
Pass

Pages get squeezed before they're sent

Your server compresses pages with Brotli or gzip — visitors download a fraction of the raw size.

WEBQ-10
Pass

Reachable on the modern internet

Your domain is reachable on IPv6.

WEBQ-31
Pass

Your homepage isn't bloated

Your homepage downloads at a reasonable size.

WEBQ-37

7 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Does it respect visitor privacy?
64
Solid
6 standards behind this question
Pass2Review1Fail2
Fail

Cookie consent banner for European visitors

No cookie banner detected, but trackers are present. If you serve EU or California traffic, this is a compliance gap.

WEBQ-46
Fail

You have a terms of service page

No terms of service page found. Without one, you have no contractual basis for the relationship with your visitors.

WEBQ-48
Review

How many outside companies you let watch your visitors

Your homepage loads a moderate number of third-party trackers. Worth auditing what each one is for.

WEBQ-49
Pass

You have a privacy policy page

Your privacy policy page is reachable from the homepage.

WEBQ-47
Pass

What your site actually drops on visitors' phones

Your homepage sets only essential cookies before consent. Non-essential cookies fire after opt-in.

WEBQ-51

1 additional standard didn't apply to this site

Does this look like a real business?
68
Excellent
12 standards behind this question
Pass3Review1Fail2
Fail

Your reviews on Trustpilot

We couldn't find a Trustpilot listing. Many consumers check Trustpilot before buying — a missing listing reads as a missing reputation.

WEBQ-60
Fail

Your company page on LinkedIn

We couldn't find a LinkedIn Company Page for this business. B2B prospects look for it before reaching out.

WEBQ-62
Review

Whether you have a Wikipedia entry

No Wikipedia entry was found for this business.

WEBQ-21
Pass

Whether anyone's written about you lately

Recent news mentions of your domain were found.

WEBQ-20
Pass

How long your domain has existed

Your domain has been registered for years — long enough to clear fraud-detection signals.

WEBQ-17
Pass

A contact form people can actually find

A visible contact form is reachable from your homepage.

WEBQ-83

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is email from this domain trustworthy?
77
Excellent
13 standards behind this question
Pass6Review1Fail3
Fail

A real tool for sending newsletters

We couldn't identify which Email Service Provider (Mailchimp, Klaviyo, ConvertKit, etc.) you're using. Either you don't send marketing email, or the integration isn't visible from the homepage.

WEBQ-80
Fail

Stops scammers from emailing customers as you

You have DMARC set up, but in monitor-only mode — it's not actually rejecting spoofed mail.

WEBQ-01
Review

What's actually running your email

We couldn't confidently identify which service is hosting your email.

WEBQ-76
Pass

Lists who's allowed to email as your business

SPF is set and lists your sending services as approved senders.

WEBQ-03
Pass

You email from your own domain, not Gmail

You send email from your own domain, not a free Gmail/Yahoo address.

WEBQ-75
Pass

You get reports when someone fakes your email

You're set up to receive daily DMARC reports of spoofing attempts.

WEBQ-77
Pass

Your email setup is under a hidden limit

Your SPF record uses fewer than 10 DNS lookups — under the spec limit.

WEBQ-82
Pass

A clickable email link on your site

Your site exposes a mailto: link visitors can tap to start a message.

WEBQ-84
Pass

Your email is being forwarded, not hosted

Mail to this domain is being forwarded — you have working email reachability.

WEBQ-85

3 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it safe to visit?
78
Excellent
21 standards behind this question
Pass8Review3Fail2
Fail

WordPress isn't leaking your usernames

Your WordPress site exposes its user list through the REST API. Attackers can enumerate every account by username — the first half of any credential-stuffing attack is already done for them.

WEBQ-06
Fail

Strict mode for your padlock check

Neither OCSP stapling nor Must-Staple is in play. A revoked cert wouldn't be caught quickly.

WEBQ-96
Review

Your padlock isn't using outdated keys

Your certificate uses outdated key strength or a SHA-1 signature. Reissue with a modern ACME-class cert.

WEBQ-89
Review

Your certificate is publicly logged

Your certificate carries only one embedded SCT — modern browsers want at least two. Reissue from a CA that includes them.

WEBQ-92
Review

Your padlock renews on a healthy schedule

Your certificate lifetime is on the longer end (> 90 days). ACME-class certs renew every 60-90 days and rotate cleanly.

WEBQ-95
Pass

Your padlock isn't about to expire

Your SSL certificate is valid and not close to expiring.

WEBQ-05
Pass

Private files aren't open to the public

None of the common admin or developer paths are publicly reachable.

WEBQ-07
Pass

Old TLS versions are turned off

Only modern TLS (1.2 and above) is offered — TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are turned off.

WEBQ-27
Pass

Forgotten subdomains aren't an open door

No forgotten or claimable subdomains were found.

WEBQ-28
Pass

Your padlock loads cleanly on every device

Your server sends the full certificate chain — every device builds the path to a trusted root cleanly.

WEBQ-90
Pass

Visitors connect faster on the first click

Your server staples a fresh OCSP response — visitors don't have to round-trip to the CA on first connect.

WEBQ-91
Pass

Your padlock comes from a reputable vendor

Your certificate is issued by a tier-1 publicly trusted CA (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Google Trust, Sectigo, etc.).

WEBQ-97
Pass

Your site finishes its handshake quickly

Your TLS handshake completes quickly — under 300ms on a cold connection.

WEBQ-98

8 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Can everyone use it?
80
Excellent
7 standards behind this question
Pass3Review1Fail1
Fail

A way to skip past the menu

No skip-to-content link is published. Keyboard users have to tab through every nav item on every page before reaching the content.

WEBQ-58
Review

Your headings are in a sensible order

Your heading levels skip — for example, an H1 followed by an H3 with no H2 in between. Screen reader users lose the outline of the page.

WEBQ-55
Pass

Your photos have written descriptions

Every image on your homepage has alt text — screen readers can describe them.

WEBQ-54
Pass

Text is dark enough to read

Text on your homepage meets WCAG AA contrast minimums — readable by visitors with low vision.

WEBQ-56
Pass

Your buttons and forms are labeled for screen readers

Interactive elements have proper ARIA labels — screen reader users get a clear description of each control.

WEBQ-57

2 additional standards didn't apply to this site