Web Quality Index
Scan complete · Scanned May 11, 2026 · 71 of 71 standards scored (29 didn’t apply)

Home/Reports/hotelshaans.com

hotelshaans.com

21-year-old e-commerce site based in United States, served through cloudflare, with email running through google.

Site typeE-commerce
Built onwordpress
Hosted byPDR
Hosted fromUnited States
Registered withPDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Domain age≈ 21 years
Online sinceJanuary 2026
Sends email throughgoogle
Managed hostPDR
CDN / WAFcloudflare
Web Quality Score
58/100
Solid
Meets the baseline standards we measure against — but with real room to improve.
Check breakdown
60 scored
A further 11 standards didn’t apply to this site — most are accessibility and privacy tests that need page contents to evaluate.
Does it respect visitor privacy?
38
Needs work
6 standards behind this question
Review1Fail3
Fail

You have a privacy policy page

No privacy policy page found. Required by GDPR, CCPA, and most app store listings.

WEBQ-47
Fail

You have a terms of service page

No terms of service page found. Without one, you have no contractual basis for the relationship with your visitors.

WEBQ-48
Fail

California privacy opt-out link

No CCPA "Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information" link found. If you have California visitors and sell or share data, this is required.

WEBQ-50
Review

How many outside companies you let watch your visitors

Your homepage loads a moderate number of third-party trackers. Worth auditing what each one is for.

WEBQ-49

2 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it fast?
53
Needs work
14 standards behind this question
Pass3Fail5
Fail

Your site uses the newest connection style

Your server still serves over the older HTTP/2 protocol — not the newer, faster HTTP/3.

WEBQ-30
Fail

Reachable on the modern internet

Your domain has no IPv6 address — only the older IPv4.

WEBQ-31
Fail

Your photos are saved in modern formats

Your images are served as JPEG or PNG when modern formats (WebP, AVIF) would cut their size by 30–60% with no visible loss.

WEBQ-32
Fail

Your text shows up while fonts load

Your fonts aren't using font-display: swap. Visitors see invisible text for a moment while the font downloads — Google penalises this.

WEBQ-36
Fail

How fast your site loads on a phone

Your homepage is slow on mobile. The data Google uses to rank pages says real visitors wait too long for it to feel ready.

WEBQ-08
Pass

Pages get squeezed before they're sent

Your server compresses pages with Brotli or gzip — visitors download a fraction of the raw size.

WEBQ-10
Pass

Photos lower on the page wait their turn

Below-fold images use loading="lazy" — they download only when the visitor scrolls toward them.

WEBQ-35
Pass

Your homepage isn't bloated

Your homepage downloads at a reasonable size.

WEBQ-37

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Can everyone use it?
64
Solid
7 standards behind this question
Pass3Fail2
Fail

Your headings are in a sensible order

Your heading levels skip — for example, an H1 followed by an H3 with no H2 in between. Screen reader users lose the outline of the page.

WEBQ-55
Fail

A way to skip past the menu

No skip-to-content link is published. Keyboard users have to tab through every nav item on every page before reaching the content.

WEBQ-58
Pass

Text is dark enough to read

Text on your homepage meets WCAG AA contrast minimums — readable by visitors with low vision.

WEBQ-56
Pass

Your photos have written descriptions

Every image on your homepage has alt text — screen readers can describe them.

WEBQ-54
Pass

Your buttons and forms are labeled for screen readers

Interactive elements have proper ARIA labels — screen reader users get a clear description of each control.

WEBQ-57

2 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is it safe to visit?
65
Excellent
21 standards behind this question
Pass7Review3Fail6
Fail

WordPress isn't leaking your usernames

Your WordPress site exposes its user list through the REST API. Attackers can enumerate every account by username — the first half of any credential-stuffing attack is already done for them.

WEBQ-06
Fail

Browser-level protections for visitors

Your site isn't sending any of the standard browser-protection headers.

WEBQ-04
Fail

Your domain can't be quietly hijacked

DNSSEC is not enabled on your domain.

WEBQ-22
Fail

Only your approved vendors can issue your padlock

There's no CAA record at your registrar saying which companies are allowed to issue certificates for you.

WEBQ-23
Fail

Visitors connect faster on the first click

Your server doesn't staple OCSP. Visitors' browsers may have to contact the CA themselves, slowing first connects.

WEBQ-91
Fail

Strict mode for your padlock check

Neither OCSP stapling nor Must-Staple is in play. A revoked cert wouldn't be caught quickly.

WEBQ-96
Review

Your padlock isn't using outdated keys

Your certificate uses outdated key strength or a SHA-1 signature. Reissue with a modern ACME-class cert.

WEBQ-89
Review

Your certificate is publicly logged

Your certificate carries only one embedded SCT — modern browsers want at least two. Reissue from a CA that includes them.

WEBQ-92
Review

Private files aren't open to the public

Some common admin or developer paths are reachable from the public internet.

WEBQ-07
Pass

Your padlock isn't about to expire

Your SSL certificate is valid and not close to expiring.

WEBQ-05
Pass

Old TLS versions are turned off

Only modern TLS (1.2 and above) is offered — TLS 1.0 and 1.1 are turned off.

WEBQ-27
Pass

Forgotten subdomains aren't an open door

No forgotten or claimable subdomains were found.

WEBQ-28
Pass

Your padlock loads cleanly on every device

Your server sends the full certificate chain — every device builds the path to a trusted root cleanly.

WEBQ-90
Pass

Your padlock renews on a healthy schedule

Your certificate uses a short validity window (≤ 90 days) — auto-renewal keeps revocation fast and frictionless.

WEBQ-95
Pass

Your padlock comes from a reputable vendor

Your certificate is issued by a tier-1 publicly trusted CA (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Google Trust, Sectigo, etc.).

WEBQ-97
Pass

Your site finishes its handshake quickly

Your TLS handshake completes quickly — under 300ms on a cold connection.

WEBQ-98

5 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Is email from this domain trustworthy?
69
Excellent
13 standards behind this question
Pass6Fail4
Fail

Stops scammers from emailing customers as you

You have DMARC set up, but in monitor-only mode — it's not actually rejecting spoofed mail.

WEBQ-01
Fail

Keeps your email private in transit

No MTA-STS or TLS-RPT policy is published — incoming mail could be downgraded to plaintext.

WEBQ-24
Fail

You get reports when someone fakes your email

No DMARC aggregate-reporting address is published — you wouldn't see spoofing attempts.

WEBQ-77
Pass

Lists who's allowed to email as your business

SPF is set and lists your sending services as approved senders.

WEBQ-03
Pass

You email from your own domain, not Gmail

You send email from your own domain, not a free Gmail/Yahoo address.

WEBQ-75
PassWEBQ-76
Pass

Your email setup is under a hidden limit

Your SPF record uses fewer than 10 DNS lookups — under the spec limit.

WEBQ-82
Pass

A clickable email link on your site

Your site exposes a mailto: link visitors can tap to start a message.

WEBQ-84
Pass

Your email is being forwarded, not hosted

Mail to this domain is being forwarded — you have working email reachability.

WEBQ-85

3 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Does this look like a real business?
75
Excellent
12 standards behind this question
Pass3Review2Fail1
Fail

Your reviews on Trustpilot

We couldn't find a Trustpilot listing. Many consumers check Trustpilot before buying — a missing listing reads as a missing reputation.

WEBQ-60
Review

Whether anyone's written about you lately

No news mentions of this domain in the last 30 days.

WEBQ-20
Review

Whether you have a Wikipedia entry

No Wikipedia entry was found for this business.

WEBQ-21
Pass

How long your site has been online

Your site has been online for years — public archives have a long history of it.

WEBQ-18
Pass

How long your domain has existed

Your domain has been registered for years — long enough to clear fraud-detection signals.

WEBQ-17
Pass

A contact form people can actually find

A visible contact form is reachable from your homepage.

WEBQ-83

6 additional standards didn't apply to this site

Can people find this site?
82
Excellent
15 standards behind this question
Pass8Review1Fail2
Fail

A trail showing where visitors are on your site

No breadcrumb schema is published. Search engines can't show breadcrumb trails under your listings, and visitors lose the trail to important pages.

WEBQ-40
Fail

Common questions answered in a Google-friendly way

No FAQ or HowTo schema found. If your pages answer common questions, marking them up gets you rich-result panels in search.

WEBQ-41
Review

A summary file for AI assistants

No /llms.txt file is published at your domain root.

WEBQ-15
Pass

Whether you're letting AI assistants read your site

You aren't blocking any AI crawlers in your robots.txt.

WEBQ-16
Pass

How well your site feeds AI the right facts

Your homepage exposes organization details AI tools can pull from.

WEBQ-45
Pass

How your site appears when shared or in search results

Your homepage has the title, description, OG, Twitter, and canonical tags.

WEBQ-11
Pass

Hidden labels that explain your business to Google

Your homepage publishes Schema.org structured data — search engines and AI tools can read what your site is directly.

WEBQ-12
Pass

A clear headline on every page

Your homepage has a clear H1 heading — search engines and screen readers know what the page is about.

WEBQ-13
Pass

A map of your site for search engines

Your sitemap.xml and robots.txt are both published.

WEBQ-14
Pass

Whether your behind-the-scenes labels are valid

Your structured-data tags parse cleanly against Schema.org.

WEBQ-39
Pass

How easy it is to reach your deepest pages

Important pages are reachable in just a click or two from your homepage.

WEBQ-43

4 additional standards didn't apply to this site